If streamlining the authorisation process for restrictive practices involved the creation of a new role of Senior Practitioner (or a similar role), the requirement for the Senior Practitioner to publish information on the performance of their functions will make it is possible to focus on what the evidence shows in Queensland, and to use this to directly inform policy and practice and to drive system-wide improvements.
The chief executive of Disability Services currently has the following prescribed functions under the DSA:
The chief executive does not currently publish information on the performance of these functions.
One idea put forward by this paper is the establishment of the role of a Senior Practitioner (or similar role) in Queensland. A Senior Practitioner (or similar role) could perform many of the authorising functions currently performed by the chief executive, the Public Guardian and QCAT.
NDIS (Restrictive Practices and Behaviour Support) Rules 2018 (Cth)
Under the NDIS Act, the NDIS Commissioner’s behaviour support functions include:
Other jurisdictions
In Victoria, the Senior Practitioner role was established in 2006 through the enactment of the Disability Act 2006 (Vic).
Victoria has collected long-term population-level data on the use of restrictive interventions and behaviour support plans over 14 years.
This has enabled investigations into what has changed over time, and what factors have affected these changes. For example, in Victoria people with autism are more likely to be restrained over the long term (for periods over at least three years) with antipsychotic medication than people without autism.
M. Senior Practitioner (or similar role) to publish data about performance of its functions.
If a role like a Senior Practitioner was created, there could be a requirement for that role to publish relevant data.
Issues to consider
The types of information a Senior Practitioner (or similar role) could publish could include the numbers and types of approvals for restrictive practices, the particular conditions or disabilities of the NDIS participants receiving restrictive practices, and the length of time restrictive practices are applied.
It would be necessary to consider the interaction of this function with the NDIS Commission to ensure no duplication of effort.